|
Post by angli_fan on Nov 18, 2010 12:12:27 GMT -5
[from the Episcopal News Service] A week after failing to convince the Anglican Province of the Southern Cone to allow its dioceses to ordain women to the priesthood, the Diocese of Uruguay has voted to seek affiliation with another province. Uruguayan Anglicans had waited for nine years since the last time the province was asked to allow women's ordination and "felt … that a patient wait would be rewarded," said Diocese of Bolivia Bishop Frank Lyons in a statement released by the Anglican Communion News Service.
Clergy members of the Southern Cone's 10th triennial synod Nov. 4 refused to approve the canonical changes required to allow for the ordination of women to the priesthood. The changes, which required a two-thirds majority in all three houses, were approved by the bishops and laity. Uruguay ordains women to the diaconate.
The Diocese of Uruguay synod met Nov. 12 in the capital city of Montevideo and decided by a simple majority vote in orders to quit the province, according to Lyons.
The diocese wants to transfer from the Southern Cone within the year, he said, adding that if permission is not given, an appeal would be made to the Anglican Consultative Council to arrange for oversight, following provincial canons.More at: ecusa.anglican.org/81808_125738_ENG_HTM.htm
|
|
|
Post by Sojourner on Nov 24, 2010 12:08:58 GMT -5
Ah, standing up with San Joaquin, Quincy, and Pittsburg in standing for what they believe. Although I understand the arguments about schism, I think the Romans have it right. Communion may be a sign of mutual belief. If you can't accede to the faith statements of a church, then why fellowship. But, then there are other views which are different and which I also think have some merit. But, then, I don't have much problem with paradox.
|
|
mewg
Acolyte
Posts: 27
|
Post by mewg on Jan 7, 2011 21:42:38 GMT -5
If identical belief were necessary for fellowship , what church would hve more than one member?
|
|