|
Post by angli_fan on Oct 3, 2006 8:13:14 GMT -5
(from the Episcopal News Service) The Episcopal Diocese of San Joaquin's December 1-2 convention will be asked to consider constitutional amendments that would "place the Diocese of San Joaquin in an ideal position to be part of any ecclesiastical structure that the Archbishop of Canterbury and Primates might design," according to a statement posted on the diocese's website October 1. The 13 amendments or additions are intended "with appropriate consultation (e.g. Archbishop of Canterbury/Primates of the Anglican Communion) to transfer all relationships and communion from ECUSA to an Anglican Province to be determined at a Special Convention called by the Bishop of San Joaquin," the statement said.
The proposed changes do not affect "the Apostolic teaching and practice of the Episcopal Church that it received by being part of the Anglican Communion" but rather "perpetuate the historic Faith of the Church in a time when these things are being challenged by others," according to the diocese's website.
The changes include, among other things, striking references to the Episcopal Church, its canons and its General Convention, and changing the qualifications for certain office holders from "communicant(s) in good standing" to "voting member(s) of a Parish or Mission."www.episcopalchurch.org/3577_78309_ENG_HTM.htm
|
|
|
Post by angli_fan on Oct 3, 2006 9:30:35 GMT -5
The Living Church offers some additional information in:San Joaquin to Consider Leaving The Episcopal Churchwww.livingchurch.org/publishertlc/viewarticle.asp?ID=2518Daily Episcopalian offers:Speaking only for myself (not as a diocesan mouthpiece): I support people who cannot in good conscience remain within the Episcopal Church finding other homes within the Anglican Communion. I support negotiated settlements on property issues. But this move seems unnecessarily confrontational to me. In fact, it seems designed to push issues of authority and ownership beyond negotiation and into either ecclesiastical or civil courts. Because if a diocese acts as though it can secceed, and the Church does nothing to stop it, then, in effect, the Church has conceeded the point. And this is true no matter how many times we reiterate in our official materials that: "Under the canons of the Episcopal Church, dioceses are designated and recognized by the General Convention."
While we are considering this issue, there is one point that I wish those eager to leave the Church would clear up for me. Where, to your way of thinking, does final ecclesiological authority rest? If push comes to shove between Communion and province, or province and diocese, or diocese and congregation, which unit has the greatest legitimacy? At the moment, the answer seems to shift with your majority, and that makes it difficult to know your mind. blog.edow.org/weblog/2006/10/san_joaquin_contemplates_seces.html
|
|