|
Post by yasoooo on Jun 3, 2022 6:18:33 GMT -5
botany at the time of Muhammad (S) was not advanced enough in any country for scientists to know that plants have both male and female parts. but in the Qur’an “(God is the One who) sent down rain from the sky and with it brought forth a variety of plants in pairs.” Qur’an, 20:53 Today we know that fruit comes from plants that have sexual characteristics even when they come from unfertilized flowers, like bananas. In the chapter ar-Ra‘d we read the following: “… and of all fruits (God) placed (on the earth) two pairs.” Qur’an, 13:3 In the field of physiology, there is one verse which appears extremely significant to me. One thousand years before the discovery of the blood circulatory system, and roughly thirteen centuries before it was determined that the internal organs were nourished by the process of digestive , a verse in the Qur’an described the source of the constituents of milk, in conformity with scientific facts. To understand this verse, it must first be known that chemical reactions occur between food and enzymes in the mouth, the stomach and the intestines releasing nutrients in molecular form which are then absorbed into the circulatory system through countless microscopic projections of the intestinal wall called villi. Blood in the circulatory system then transports the nutrients to all the organs of the body, among which are the milk-producing mammary glands. This biological process must be basically understood, if we are to understand a verse in the Qur’an which has for many centuries given rise to commentaries that were totally incomprehensible. Today it is not difficult to see why! This verse is taken from the chapter an-Nahl: “Verily, in cattle there is a lesson for yon. I give you drink from their insides, coming from a conjunction between the digested contents ( of the intestines ) and the blood, milk pure and pleasant for those who drink it.” Qur’an, 16:66 The constituents of milk are secreted by the mammary glands which are nourished by the product of food digestion brought to them by the bloodstream. The initial event which sets the whole process in motion is the conjunction of the contents of the intestine and blood at the level of the intestinal wall itself. This very precise concept is the result of the discoveries made in the chemistry and physiology of the digestive system over one thousand years after the time of Prophet Muhammad (S). Plant and fruit reproduction in The Quran www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_Uy6lzQb7UMiracle of the Holy Quran for blood circulation and milk production Lecturer Zakir Naik www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NzXVXSvqhwDVD 184 Al-Qur'an -- Miracle of miracles -- Walton forest -- London www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtA4HXfcIXA
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Jun 14, 2022 6:09:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Jun 21, 2022 1:16:06 GMT -5
the complexity of the semen and the fact that an infinitely small quantity is required to ensure fertilization. In chapter al-Insaan the Qur’an states: “Verily, I created humankind from a small quantity of mingled fluids.” Qur’an, 76:2 The Arabic word nutfah has been translated as “small quantity”. It comes from the verb meaning ‘to dribble, to trickle’ and is used to describe what remains in the bottom of a bucket which has been emptied. The verse correctly implies that fertilization is performed by only a very small volume of liquid. On the other hand, mingled fluids ( amshaaj ) has been understood by early commentators to refer to the mixture of male and female discharges. Modern authors have corrected this view and note that the sperm is made up of various components. When the Qur’an talks of a fertilizing fluid composed of different components, it also informs us that human progeny will be formed from something extracted from this liquid. This is the meaning of the following verse in chapter as-Sajdah: “Then He made [ man's ] offspring from the essence of a despised fluid.” Qur’an, 32:8 The Arabic word translated by the term ‘essence’ is sulaalah which means ‘something extracted, the best part of a thing’. In whatever way it is translated, it refers to part of a whole. Under normal conditions, only one single cell, spermatozoon, out of over 50 million ejaculated by a man during sexual intercourse will actually penetrate the ovule. Dr Zakir Naik - Creation of Men- from sperm or dust - Does Quran contradicts? www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pnc4woJSfkThe Quran | Embryology and Semen Production From between the Backbone and the Ribs | Part 1 www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMQPkDKnOCMThe Quran | Embryology and Semen Production From between the Backbone and the Ribs | Part 2 www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eghBcXYddk
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Jun 28, 2022 7:57:10 GMT -5
Famous vote: In the year 325 AD, that is, about three centuries after Jesus Christ, the men of the church held a meeting to discuss the nature of Jesus: Is he a human being, a messenger or a god embodied in a human being? After long discussions, the meeting concluded that he was an apostle. But the decision did not please the Emperor of Constantinople at the time, so he dissolved the Synod and appointed new priests. Discussions took place and they came to the decision for which the emperor appointed them; It is that Christ is a human God. Thus, Jesus attained the rank of gods by voting, and at that time, Jesus was the first to be appointed as a god by voting! Finally, the evil of the scourge is what laughs! revised edition: There is an edition of the Christian book editions called the "Revised Edition" that is: revised and amended. How is it permissible to revise a book that is the word of God?! How do they fix it?! The word of God is not tampered with by anyone, neither revision nor revision nor addition.. الشيخ عثمان ابن فاروق وهروب المسيحي من الرد المفحم www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mt85_Ul-O3Uالنصراني في الفخ - أحمد ديدات صغير يغير موازين النقاش Speaker's corner www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUCNOIjD2HQغير مسلم يسأل الداعيه المسلم شمسي عن الخمر والجنة www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTM_swOOO-Mلماذا اعتنقت الإسلام؟ - حمزة في حوار مع زائر www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcJWY0iXZGc
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Jul 12, 2022 10:42:11 GMT -5
The souls of the prophets in the Paradise, and with them are the souls of the martyrs and the righteous who died from our nation and previous nations as well. As for the bodies, they are all on earth, including the bodies of the prophets, And that the first person to enter Paradise will be blessed with his soul and body, our Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, Jesus, peace be upon him, (with his body and soul) is in one of the seven heavens, not in the Paradise The Prophet Moses, peace be upon him, was mentioned several times in the Qur’an More than the Prophet Muhammad and the Prophet Jesus Christ, peace be upon them Islam does not differentiate between the prophets, they are all brothers, and one message is that God is one, not three, and not a human being If the criterion for the differentiation in the Noble Qur’an was the number of times the name “knowledge” was mentioned, then “Satan” would have been higher than many of the prophets, as the number of times this name appeared close to seventy times, which exceeds the number of times that of names Some messengers and prophets! الخبير الإسلامي شمسي يشرح لملحد بالانجليزية وفي النهاية يكتشف شيئأ www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzO5ceA-RsEيلعبون علينا_ شيخ وهاشم مع يهود Speaker's corner www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jew-RuC_2Pwالداعيه منصور ينهي حواره مع مبشر مسيحي بسبب عدم تركيزة www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOXoAqYyOZMتوقف عن التكبر! - محمد حجاب ونصراني معقد Speaker's corner www.youtube.com/watch?v=96EIlGlfFigامرأة ثملة تنفعل وتشتم ثم تركل الكاميرا خلال حوار لمنصور www.youtube.com/watch?v=64l3jvRMKyU
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Jul 18, 2022 10:44:58 GMT -5
Previous prophets were sent to a particular group of people and their message was supposed to be followed for a particular time period. Since previous revelations were time-bound, God did not preserve them Himself. the Quran cannot be compared with the previous Scriptures. The Quran is unique in many aspects. It is the final revelation to mankind. Previous scriptures were sent to their respective people only. The Quran is universal. So God promised to protect the Quran God says in the Qur’an (9) Indeed, it is We who sent down the message [i.e., the Qur’ān], and indeed, We will be its guardian. Muslims accept the original unaltered Torah (as revealed to Prophet Moses, peace be upon him). Muslims also accept the original unaltered Bible (as revealed to Prophet Jesus, peace be upon him). These original scriptures were revealed by God (Allah). none of these scriptures exist today in their original form or in their entirety. فتيات يهوديات يضحكن سعداء جدا! محمد حجاب ويهوديات - ركن المتحدثين www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjNOmCg9At4رأيت يسوع في أسبانيا_ شمسي في حوار مع مسيحي www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYE27mDxzaYملاكم أمريكي- لهذه الأسباب أحترم الإسلام www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHTtMLQjo-Qرجع الي بلادك يا منصور، وانت أتيت متي؟ عنصر-ي مت-طرف أhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEFcIBVIhU4 عراك ايراني قوي يفسد نقاش لطيف - منصور مع بريطاني Speaker's www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkYXJ0P1-Jcالخبير شمسي بشئون المسيحيين واليهود يفتح عقولهم لكتبهم www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k1WJMSAxJE
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Jul 28, 2022 9:55:42 GMT -5
The calendar year of Islam begins not with the birthday of our prophet (peace be on him), not from the time that the revelation came to him (Bethat) nor from the time of his ascension to heaven, but with the migration (Hijra) from an undesirable environment into a desirable place to fulfill Allah's command. It was migration from a plot that was set by the leaders of the Quraysh who were plotting to kill prophet Muhammad, and to destroy the truth that today is being conveyed to mankind everywhere against tyranny and injustice. Their purpose was to destroy the foundation of the Islamic state, the Sunnah of the tradition of the prophet, and to prevent the revelation being delivered by Allah's messenger to mankind. The Islamic calendar is reckoned from the time of migration (Hijra) of Prophet Mohammad (Peace Be Upon Him) from Mecca to Madina. The Prophet's decision to migrate from Mecca came after several years of inhuman treatment of the faithful by the powerful tribes who were united despite all their feuds to stop the spread of Islam. Prophet Mohammad's decision to leave Mecca coincided with the infidel's plan to assassinate him. In 622 AD, the Quresh tribesmen held a meeting and decided that a band of young men, one from each tribe, should assassinate Prophet Mohammad collectively so that their responsibility for the murder could not be placed on any particular tribe. On the eventful night, the Prophet asked his cousin Ali Ben Abutalib to take his place in bed to make the Meccans think that he was asleep. The Prophet himself slipped out unobserved alongwith his loyal follower Abu Bakr (who was chosen as the first C aliph after the death of the prophet). They secretly made their way to a cave named Thawr, not far from Mecca and lay in hiding there for a day or two until Abu Bakr's son reported that the search for him had been given up. Then the two set out from Madina on camel back. They reached Quba, on the edge of the Madina oasis, on 12th Rabiul Awwal. With Mohammad's arrival in Quba a new phase of his career and glory of Islam started. This migration has a special significance in the history of Islam. It ended the Meccan period of humiliation and torture and began the era of success. His own people to whom he preached Islam for 13 years neglected the Prophet of Islam. But he was cordially received in Madina as an honored chief. In Madina his power enhanced day by day. Here he was not only the religious leader but took the role of a politician and statesman too. Prophet Mohammad expired ten years after his migration to Madina but only in one decade he changed the course of human history. In view of this special significance of the Prophet's migration the consultative body advised the Second Islamic Caliph, Omar ben Khattab, to start the Islamic year from the date of migration of the Prophet from Mecca to Madina. According to early Moslem scholars, Abu Musa Al Shari drew attention of Omar to an improperly dated debenture or IOU which was payable in the month of Shaban but it was not clear which Shaban was actually meant, the present one or the coming one. Omar called the dignitaries for consultation who made several suggestions to begin the Islamic calendar. Ali (who later became the fourth caliph) suggested the Hijra as the beginning of the Islamic year with Moharram as its first month. Consequently, Caliph Omar in 21 A.H. or 641 A.D introduced the Islamic calendar in its present form. QURANIC GUIDANCE The guidance about the Islamic calendar is taken from the following verses from the Holy Quran: (In the name of GOD most gracious and most merciful) "Lo the number of the months with God is twelve months." IX:36. "They ask thee, of new moons. Say: They are fixed seasons for mankind and for the pilgrimage." II:189. "He it is who appointed the sun a splendor and the moon a light, and measured for her stages, that ye might know the number of the years, and the reckoning." X:5 The Islamic Calendar of 12 Lunar Months is determined by observation of the new moon with no effort by intercalation (addition) or other means to synchronize the Lunar year with the Solar year. Hijra of the Prophet Muhammad SAWS By Sheikh Shady Alsuleiman www.youtube.com/watch?v=TebwAAyMfh8 Al-Hijrah: A migration that changed history | VRIC Conversations www.youtube.com/watch?v=jigdilsVOs4اللقاحات مؤامرة صه.يونية - منصور في حوار مع زائرين www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2T2KYSEa7Eرسالة إلى طاعنين في الإسلام من المرتدين و غيرهم من الأخ شمسي وفقه الله www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBSpnMmU9Lsمسيحيون يناظرون بعضهم وهاشم يضحك ثم يرد عليهم www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuefPAUoIt4إنه محرف !! - منصور في حوار مع مسيحي www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHjznadSCS8
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Aug 4, 2022 7:40:32 GMT -5
Once the egg has been fertilized in the fallopian tube, it descends to lodge itself inside the uterus. This process is called the ‘implantation of the egg’. Implantation is a result of the development of villosities, which, like roots in the soil, draw nourishment from the wall of the uterus and make the egg literally cling to the womb. The process of implantation is appropriately described in several verses by the word ‘alaq, which is also the title of the chapter in which one of the verses appears: “God fashioned humans from a clinging entity.” Qur’an, 96:2 The evolution of the embryo inside the maternal uterus is only briefly described, but the description is accurate, because the simple words referring to it correspond exactly to fundamental stages in its growth. This is what we read in a verse from the chapter al-Mu’minoon: “I fashioned the clinging entity into a chewed lump of flesh and I fashioned the chewed flesh into bones and I clothed the bones with intact flesh.” Qur’an, 23:14 The term ‘chewed flesh’ (mudghah) corresponds exactly to the appearance of the embryo at a certain stage in its development. It is known that the bones develop inside this mass and that they are then covered with muscle. This is the meaning of the term ‘intact flesh’ (lahm). The embryo passes through a stage where some parts are in proportion and others out of proportion with what is later to become the individual. This is the obvious meaning of a verse in the chapter al-Hajj, which reads as follows: “I fashioned (humans) a clinging entity, then into a lump of flesh in proportion and out of proportion.” Qur’an, 22:5. Next, we have a reference to the appearance of the senses and internal organs in the chapter as-Sajdah: “… and (God) gave you ears, eyes and hearts.” Qur’an, 32:9 Nothing here contradicts today’s data and, furthermore, none of the mistaken ideas of the time have crept into the Qur’an. Throughout the Middle Ages there were a variety of beliefs about human development based on myths and speculations which continued for several centuries after the period. The most fundamental stage in the history of embryology came in 1651 with Harvey’s statement that “all life initially comes from an egg”. At that time, when science had benefited greatly from the invention of the microscope, people were still arguing about the respective roles of the egg and spermatozoon. Buffon, the great naturalist, was one of those in favor of the egg theory.Bonnet, on the other hand, supported the theory of ‘the ovaries of Eve’, which stated that Eve, the mother of the human race, was-supposed to have had inside her the seeds of all human beings packed together one inside the other. Embryology in the Quran – Part 4 - Dr Zakir Naik www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4mpZ7okXMA
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Aug 8, 2022 3:52:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Aug 18, 2022 11:46:57 GMT -5
comparison between modern knowledge and passages in the Qur’an that are also referred to in the Bible. Creation We have already come across some of the contradictions between scripture and science regarding the creation of the universe. When dealing with that topic, I stressed the perfect agreement between modern knowledge and verses in the Qur’an, and pointed out that the Biblical narration contained statements that were scientifically unacceptable. This is hardly surprising if we are aware that the narration of the creation contained in the Bible was the work of priests living in the sixth century BC, hence the term ‘sacerdotal’ ( priestly ) narration is officially used to refer to it. The narration seems to have been conceived as the theme of a sermon designed to exhort people to observe the Sabbath. The narration was constructed with a definite end in view, and as Father de Vaux (a former head of the Biblical School of Jerusalem) has noted, this end was essentially legalist in character. The Bible also contains a much shorter and older narration of Creation, the so-called ‘Yahvist’ version, which approaches the subject from a completely different angle. They are both taken from Genesis, the first book of the Pentateuch or Torah. Moses is supposed to have been its author, but the text we have today has undergone many changes. The sacerdotal narration of Genesis is famous for its whimsical genealogies, that go back to Adam, and which nobody takes very seriously. Nevertheless, such Gospel authors as Matthew and Luke have reproduced them, more or less word-for-word, in their genealogies of Jesus. Matthew goes back as far as Abraham, and Luke to Adam. These writings are scientifically unacceptable, because they set a date for the age of the world and the time humans appeared on Earth, which most definitely contradicts what modern science has firmly established. The Qur’an, on the other hand, is completely free of dates of this kind. Earlier on, we noted how perfectly the Qur’an agrees with modern ideas on the formation of the Universe. On the other hand, the Biblical narration of primordial waters is hardly, nor is the creation of light on the first day before the creation of the stars which produce this light; the existence of an evening and a morning before the creation of the earth; the creation of the earth on the third day before that of the sun on the fourth; the appearance of beasts of the earth on the sixth day after the appearance of the birds of the air on the fifth day, although the former came first. All these statements are the result of beliefs prevalent at the time this text was written and do not have any other meaning. Qur'an & Bible In The Light of Science - The Ultimate Dialogue www.youtube.com/watch?v=eezncqgZJrYاحمد ديدات محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم العظيم.wmv www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SO86cs3ZXU
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Aug 23, 2022 7:30:24 GMT -5
comparison between the Bible and the Qur’an; descriptions of the deluge. In actual fact, the Biblical narration is a fusion of two descriptions in which events are related differently. The Bible speaks of a universal flood and places it roughly 300 years before Abraham. According to what we know of Abraham, this would imply a universal cataclysm around the twenty-first or twenty-second century BC This story would be untenable, in view of presently available historical data. How can we accept the idea that, in the twenty-first or twenty-second century BC, all civilization was wiped off the face of the earth by a universal cataclysm, when we know that this period corresponds, for example, to the one preceding the Middle Kingdom in Egypt, at roughly the date of the first Intermediary period before the eleventh dynasty? It is historically unacceptable to maintain that, at this time, humanity was totally wiped out. None of the preceding statements is acceptable according to modern knowledge. From this point of view, we can measure the enormous gap separating the Bible from the Qur’an. In contrast to the Bible, the narration contained in the Qur’an deals with a cataclysm that is limited to Noah’s people. They were punished for their sins, as were other ungodly peoples. The Qur’an does not fix the cataclysm in time. There are absolutely no historical or archaeological objections to the narration in the Qur’an. Noah's Ark in the bible and the quran www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ea3B7PHvFUلماذا يسمح الإله بالمعاناة والابتلاءات في العالم؟ | زوار يسألون الشيخ عثمان www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMfKR-k-pIQ
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Sept 1, 2022 2:19:14 GMT -5
Moses was probably born during the reign of Ramesses II. Biblical data. are therefore of considerable historical value in the story of Moses. A medical study of the mummy of Merneptah has yielded further useful information on the possible causes of this pharaoh’s death. The fact that we possess the mummy of this pharaoh is one of paramount importance. The Bible records that pharaoh was engulfed in the sea, but does not give any details as to what subsequently became of his corpse. The Qur’an, in chapter Yoonus, notes that the body of the pharaoh would be saved from the waters: “Today I will save your dead body so that you may be a sign for those who come after you.” Qur’an, 10:92 A medical examination of this mummy, has, shown that the body could not have stayed in the water for long, because it does not show signs of deterioration due to prolonged submersion. Here again, the comparison between the narration in the Qur’an and the data provided by modern knowledge does not give rise to the slightest objection from a scientific point of view. Such points of agreement are characteristic of the Qur’anic revelation. But, are we throwing the Judeo-Christian revelation into discredit and depriving it of all its intrinsic value by stressing the faults as seen from a scientific point of view? I think not because the criticism is not aimed at the text as a whole, but only at certain passages. There are parts of the Bible which have an undoubted historical value. I have shown that in my book, The Bible, The Qur’an and Science, where I discuss passages which enable us to locate Moses in time. The main causes which brought about such differences as arise from the comparison between the Holy Scriptures and modern knowledge is known to modern scholars. The Old Testament constitutes a collection of literary works produced in the course of roughly nine centuries and which has undergone many alterations. The part played by men in the actual composition of the texts of the Bible is quite considerable. The Qur’anic revelation, on the other hand, has a history which is radically different. As we have already seen, from the moment it was first commto humans, it was learnt by heart and written down during Muhammad’s own lifetime. It is thanks to this fact that the Qur’an does not pose any problem of authenticity. A totally objective examination of the Qur’an, in the light of modern knowledge, leads us to recognize the agreement between the two, as has already been noted on repeated occasions throughout this presentation. It makes us deem it quite unthinkable for a man of Muhammad’s time to have been the author of such statements, on account of the state of knowledge in his day. Such considerations are part of what gives the Qur’anic revelation its unique place among religious and non-religious texts, and forces the impartial scientist to admit his inability to provide an explanation based solely upon materialistic reasoning. Such facts as I have had the pleasure of exposing to you here, appear to represent a genuine challenge to human explanation leaving only one alternative: the Qur’an is undoubtedly a revelation from God. Scientific Miracles Of The Holy Quran - Preservation of pharaoh's body in the time of Moses www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkmz5T0UauQMusa (AS) and Firaun (Moses and Pharoah) - Nouman Ali Khan (Full Lecture) www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgwdeGPAMx4
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Sept 5, 2022 9:36:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Sept 12, 2022 5:59:56 GMT -5
16 I have chosen and consecrated this temple so that my Name may be there forever. My eyes and my heart will always be there. 2 Chronicles 7:16 It is clear and understandable that the unlimited God is impossible to limit or circumscribe anywhere. God does not bind himself in the templeBecause Christ indicated the place of God in heaven In fact, the Bible states that God has a specific dwelling place, which is the heavens. A prayer for King Solomon in which he says: “43 then hear from heaven, your dwelling place. Do whatever the foreigner asks of you, so that all the peoples of the earth may know your name and fear you, as do your own people Israel, and may know that this house I have built bears your Name. 1 Kings 8:43 When Jesus Christ taught his disciples how to pray, 'Our Father in heaven, may your name be kept holy. Matthew 6:9 After Christ’s resurrection, he ascended “to heaven itself, now to appear before God,” the Bible states.—Hebrews 9:24. 24 For Christ did not enter a sanctuary made with human hands that was only a copy of the true one; he entered heaven itself, now to appear for us in God’s presence. The story of the Temple is just lies, written by the scribes of the "Bible", They attributed this fabricated story to God. This is for the benefit of the Jews for their occupation of Jerusalem Considering that their king will not be completed except by the return of that alleged temple. There is no reliable source that proves that Solomon, peace be upon him, built this temple And also Why did the Holy Quran not speak of the Temple? If he is of such sanctity and majesty that the Jews mention?! انجليزي يقول ابنتي حاضت في السن 8_ واجابات جميلة صدمت نصراني عن عائشة من قبل الشيخ www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZ44iwqwTgAأبعد منه!_ زائر ينعت هاشم بالقذر والخنزير فجاءه الرد Speaker's corner www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAhae-OiyRQإنجليزية تعتنق الإسلام! يوم عظيم - Speaker's corner www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dCGcw4_DA4زائر يتهرب من سماع رسالة الإسلام من حمزة www.youtube.com/watch?v=3u9gpAZg6fYأحمق! انجليزي و هاشم Speakers corner www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0FE0OfnmR8لاعب رغبي مشهور يدين بإنجازاته لاعتناق الإسلام- أصبحت حراً www.youtube.com/watch?v=kW0nAJ8Bvpk
|
|
|
Post by yasoooo on Sept 19, 2022 6:31:41 GMT -5
How come readers of the Quran know that ants speak, when it was revealed 1,400 years ago? Muhammad couldn't read or write. That's because it was revealed to him. Despite being illiterate, he was revealed this information from Allah. There is a Surah called Al-Naml which means The Ants. The verse in the Quran goes like, [Quran 27.18] Until, when they came upon the valley of the ants, an ant said (for females), "O ants, enter your homes so that you do not be crushed by Solomon and his soldiers while they do not feel it." “All male ants have wings. All worker ants are females. All ants that don't have wings are definitely females. This was only known recently. But 1400 years ago the Quran addressed ants who cannot fly in the female mode: For the word "said": Kala (قال) is for males. Kalat (قالت) is for females. The Quran used Kalat (female). If this ant had wings it would have flown off however it didn't have this option, instead it's only option was to hide underground. Since it didn't have wings then this was definitely a female ant. Here the Quran correctly addressed this ant in the female mode.” This is truly an amazing thing that was in the Quran ,as ants communicate with each other, such as to warn another, presented in this verse. Ants ' Wingless ants are all females' Miracles of Quran #HUDATV www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMD9Z2UsIqwQuran miracle, Talking ants, Scientific discovery in 2009, proof that quran is from God www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEGPOaAilvcالنقاش والحوارالمسيحي مع المسلم وإزدواجية المعايير www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwTYitvpLgoالرد على المسيحي الذي يرفض محمد لأنه تزوج طفلة ست سنوات www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQGlzRJaaWg&t=260sزائر محترم يود التعرف أكثر على الإسلام - حوار حمزة مع زائر www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIzeChfucWU
|
|